RareResearch.AI
← Back to atlas

P504L

Category 3/4 — Most DruggablePathogenicTransmembrane · predictedEditorial
ProlineLeucine at position 504 · TM6 (496-516), helical transmembrane · WFS1 (Wolframin)

Proline → Leucine at position 504 inside wolframin's sixth transmembrane helix (TM6). ClinVar Pathogenic with the broadest clinical spectrum in the gene — Wolfram syndrome 1, Wolfram-like syndrome, DFNA6 hearing loss, Cataract 41, type 2 diabetes. AlphaMissense 0.797, DynaMut2 ΔΔG -0.56 kcal/mol (destabilising). One of two adjacent variants (with C505Y) characterizing a vulnerable TM6 region.

Interactive 3D Structure

Wild-type reference
Wild-type P504 — hydrogen bond to Y508
Fullscreen ↗
DynaMut2 mutant · P504L
Mutant L504 — hydrogen bond to S502 lost (3 contacts lost)
Fullscreen ↗

Bond changes · DynaMut2 interaction analysis

3 lost0 gained8 preserved
Interaction typeWild-type partnerMutant partnerStatus
Hydrogen bondL484Lost
Hydrogen bondS502S502Preserved
Hydrogen bondL507L507Preserved
Hydrogen bondY508Y508Preserved
Polar contactS502S502Preserved
Polar contactL507L507Preserved
Polar contactY508Y508Preserved
Van der WaalsS502Lost
Van der WaalsP885Lost
HydrophobicL468L468Preserved
HydrophobicP885P885Preserved

Lost / gained / preserved interatomic contacts at the variant residue, from the DynaMut2 (Arpeggio) interaction analysis of the wild-type and energy-minimized mutant structures.

Computational Predictions

DynaMut2 ΔΔG
-0.56kcal/mol
Destabilising — mild
AlphaMissense
0.796
LPath
AlphaFold pLDDT
83
model confidence
Schema
Cat 3/4
Category 3/4 — Most Druggable
ΔΔG confidence: Reduced confidence · Transmembrane
  • transmembrane position; predictor benchmarked on soluble proteins

This variant sits in the transmembrane band. The stability value was computed with a predictor benchmarked on water-soluble proteins. Published benchmarks of ddG predictors on membrane proteins report correlation below 0.4. Treat the magnitude as unreliable and the sign as weak evidence only.

Do not rank this value against a variant from a different region on ΔΔG alone.

Clinical Evidence

ClinVar classificationPathogenic
Review statuscriteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
Associated conditionsWolfram syndrome 1; Wolfram-like syndrome; Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6 (DFNA6); Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Cataract 41
InheritanceBoth autosomal dominant (DFNA6, Wolfram-like syndrome) and autosomal recessive (classical Wolfram syndrome 1) presentations documented. Among the most clinically validated WFS1 variants by case count.
Population frequency (gnomAD v4)Ultra-rare · AF 0.0028%
cDNA changec.1511C>T
ClinVar accessionVCV000004512
Last evaluated2026/01/12 00:00

Observed at very low frequency in gnomAD.

Classified for2★ documented assertion

ClinVar classifies this variant as Pathogenic for Wolfram syndrome (classic) (autosomal recessive, OMIM 222300); Wolfram-like syndrome (autosomal dominant, OMIM 614296); Nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNA6/14/38) (autosomal dominant, OMIM 600965); WFS1-related diabetes (autosomal dominant); Cataract 41 (autosomal dominant, OMIM 116400). These are two clinically distinct disease families: classic Wolfram syndrome requires two affected copies, while the dominant WFS1-related disorders do not. One label covers both, and it does not tell you which applies to a given person.

  • Wolfram syndrome (classic)autosomal recessive · OMIM 222300submitted as: Wolfram syndrome 1; Wolfram syndrome 1; Wolfram syndrome 1
  • Wolfram-like syndromeautosomal dominant · OMIM 614296submitted as: Wolfram-like syndrome; Wolfram-like syndrome
  • Nonsyndromic hearing loss (DFNA6/14/38)autosomal dominant · OMIM 600965submitted as: Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 6
  • WFS1-related diabetesautosomal dominantsubmitted as: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Cataract 41autosomal dominant · OMIM 116400submitted as: Cataract 41
  • Phenotype scope is interpretation of submitted records. The computed values on this card (AlphaMissense, DynaMut2 ΔΔG, pLDDT) are measurements of the model, not of a patient.
  • Presentation cannot be generalised from neighbouring variants: one nucleotide over can present very differently. Structural similarity supports a mechanistic hypothesis, never a phenotype claim.

Review status: 2★ multiple submitters, no conflicts. ClinVar "conditions" is the union of all submissions; 0–1★ entries are submitted conditions, not documented phenotypes.

Population frequency
Global (all ancestries)
AF 0.0028% · 45 / 1,611,276 alleles
Homozygotes
0
Highest-frequency population
Admixed American · AF 0.0067%

Highest in Admixed American: AF 0.0067% (4 of 60,010 alleles), 2.4x the global figure. The global AF describes the general population, not the at-risk group.

No homozygotes reported in gnomAD v4. For a recessive allele this is expected and is not, on its own, evidence either way.

Ancestry groupAllele freq.AC / ANHom.Carrier est.
Admixed American0.0067%4 / 60,0100~1 in 7500
European (non-Finnish)0.0033%39 / 1,180,0320~1 in 15130
Remaining individuals0.0032%2 / 62,4580~1 in 15610

Source: gnomAD r4, retrieved 2026-08-21. Values are allele frequencies. The carrier estimate is derived from the allele frequency (Hardy-Weinberg, ~2·AF) and is an approximation, not a published figure — where a published carrier frequency exists it outranks this column and is cited on the card.

Structural Context

Position 504 sits inside TM6, immediately adjacent to C505 (Atlas card adjacent). The AlphaFold model places P504 within 5 Å of VAL503 (2.5 Å), CYS505 (2.5 Å), SER502 (4.1 Å), PRO885 (4.1 Å, from TM11 — same cross-helix contact as C505/P885), LEU507 (4.3 Å), and LEU506 (4.5 Å). The proline at position 504 occupies the same structural micro-environment as the C505 next to it, and both contact PRO885 in TM11 at ~4.1 Å.

The wild-type proline at 504 plays a deliberate kinking role in TM6. Just as P885 kinks TM11 (see P885L Atlas card), P504 introduces a controlled helix bend in TM6. This is structurally remarkable: TM6 contains a proline-induced kink at position 504, TM11 contains a proline-induced kink at position 885, and the two kinks face each other across the membrane at the C505/P885 interface. The geometry suggests an intentional structural register that the protein's evolutionary design depends on.

Replacing the TM6 proline with leucine removes the helix kink — TM6 becomes more linear than the wild-type. The PRO885 in TM11 remains in place, but its docking partner across the helix interface has changed shape. The TM6-TM11 register slips. DynaMut2 reports a |ΔΔG| of 0.56 kcal/mol — the fold absorbs it, but the geometric relationship across the helix interface is materially perturbed.

The clinical breadth of P504L (five documented phenotypes spanning both AD and AR Wolfram presentations) is striking given the AlphaMissense score of 0.797 is the lowest of any variant in this batch. The disconnect suggests AlphaMissense's training is conservative about proline substitutions; the clinical evidence is overwhelming.

Amino-acid chemistry
Proline (P) → Leucine (L) — a rigid, helix-breaking residue replaced by a flexible, branched hydrophobic. The substitution removes a deliberate helix kink from a transmembrane segment.
Position in the protein
TM6 (residues 496–516) · position 504 is bilayer-embedded, immediately preceding C505 in the helix sequence. Together with C505 it sits at a structurally critical region of TM6.

Druggability Assessment

Category 3/4 — Most Druggable. |ΔΔG| = 0.56 kcal/mol — fold survives. AlphaMissense 0.797 is in the likely-pathogenic range; the broad clinical spectrum (five phenotypes) confirms severe functional consequence.

The mechanism is removal of a deliberate TM6 helix kink, slipping the TM6-TM11 register at the C505/P504/P885 interface. The therapeutic strategy is geometric: a small molecule that stabilizes the TM6-TM11 packing in the wild-type kink geometry, ideally engaging both sides of the interface (TM6 and TM11) simultaneously.

Compare with P885L (Atlas card adjacent) for the reciprocal mechanism, and with C505Y for an alternative TM6 substitution at the same interface. Three Atlas variants (P504L, C505Y, P885L) converge on a single therapeutic target.

Why this matters

P504L exemplifies why the Atlas's neighbor analysis matters: the variant's mechanism is invisible from sequence alone but visible from structure. P504, C505, and P885 form a three-residue cross-helix register that is required for TM6-TM11 geometry. Three variants in the Atlas (P504L, C505Y, P885L) perturb this register through different substitutions. A drug that rescues one rescues all three — and likely several other variants in the same region not yet in the Windsor Set.
Therapeutic Strategy Handoff · prediction

Feed this card to Wolfram Intelligence

Download the P504L PDF below and upload it to Wolfram Intelligence to generate therapeutic-strategy proposals — guanidinium mimetics, sigma-1 agonist docking, NAC thiol-capping. NAC is already on the bench-testing list.

Download P504L PDF card ↓Strategies are AI-generated predictions, not validated therapeutics.

UniProt Domain Annotation

Chain1890 · Wolframin
Transmembrane496516 · Helical
Natural variant504504 · in WFS1; dbSNP:rs28937892